.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Friday, September 16, 2005

 

A list of donations

Foreign Policy posts a list of the names of the countries which pledged money for damage of Hurricane Katrina and the amount of their donation.
What attracted my attention are as follows.

Afghanistan $ 100,000
Australia $ 7.6 million
Bangladesh $ 1 million
Britain $ 0 note: it sent supply/personnel
Canada $ 5 million
China $ 5.1 million
France $ 1 million
Germany $ 0 note: it sent supply/personnel
India $ 5 million
Indonesia $ 25,000
Iran $ 0 note: Iran offered 20 million barrels of oil—if the United States lifts its sanctions
Iraq $ 1 million
Japan $ 200,000 and 1.5 million private donations
Kwait $ 100 million
Malaysia $ 1 million
Pakistan $ 1 million
Qatar $ 100 million
Russia $ 0 note: It sent supply/personnel
Saudi Arabia $ 5 million note: It offered to increase oil production
South Korea $ 30 million
Taiwan $ 2 million
United Arab Emirates $ 100 million
Ukraine $ 2 million
Venezuela $ 1 million


This list is very interesting when I consider today’s international politics. It would be more interesting when you compare this with the list of tsunami donations

Tear-provoking efforts by small countries impressed me. And pro- American Middle Eastern countries donated huge money. On the other hand, developed countries including Japan did not pay much money. Indonesia, a Tsunami affected country, did not seem to show its gratitude to the U.S. South Korea, which attitude to the U.S. has been ambiguous since inauguration of president Roh, donated much money. China, which was so stingy to Tsunami affected nations, gave the U.S. relatively much money and allegedly raised its donation from 5million to 5.1 million after India decided to donate 5 million.

Also, what made me surprised are responses from Iran, Venezuela, and North Korea, representative anti-American countries. (Though the name of North Korea is not listed here, it is reported that North Korean Red Cross sent a consoling letter to the U.S.)

Comments:
Quite interesting!

From the European perspective, Harricanes seem to have signified the beginning of the downfall of the Empire. Or at least they could trigger a fundamental transformation in the US foreign policy by cracking the confidence within the people.

Is it too short-sighted? What do you make of the symbological implications of the harricanes?
 
I hadn't noticed your previous entry on Haricane Katrina before I wrote the above comment.

I just want to add that, needless to say, I personally think that it is nothing but a tragedy that so many people have been suffering from the damage of the harricanes. And I feel terribly sorry for them.
 
I don't know it's symbological one, but Katrina actually damaged Bush administration.

Also, I worry about frequent natural disasters and rampant epidemics in the world. I thought my town was immune from such disaster, but I had floods this weekend and the basement of my house was flooded...
 
Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?